WebFeb 1, 2024 · A party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement the response to include information thereafter acquired. (g) Court Filing of Documents and Discovery. Information obtained during discovery shall not be filed with the court until such time as it is filed for good cause. WebA party who has responded to a request for discovery with a response that was complete when made is under no duty to supplement his response to include information thereafter acquired, except as follows: (1) A party is under a duty seasonably to supplement his response with respect to any question directly addressed to the identity and location ...
What Is a Party
WebFinally, under amended Supreme Court Rule 213(i), a party has a duty to seasonably supplement or amend any prior answer or response whenever new or additional … WebMar 17, 2024 · (i)Duty to Supplement. A party has a duty to seasonably supplement or amend any prior answer or response whenever new or additional information subsequently becomes known to that party. (j) The Supreme Court, by administrative order, may … softwalk irish ii mary jane block heel pumps
What does "Supplement Discovery" mean in a criminal case?
Webto the same extent as a discovery deposition. (i) Duty to Supplement. A party has a duty to seasonably supplement or amend any prior answer or response whenever new or additional information subsequently becomes known to that party. (j) The Supreme Court, by administrative order, may approve standard forms of interrogatories Web(1) A party is under a duty to supplement promptly its disclosures if the party learns that in some material respect the information disclosed is incomplete or incorrect and if the additional or corrective information has not otherwise been made known to the other parties during the discovery process or in writing. WebThe duty to supplement discovery responses continues to be governed by Rule 26(e). Concern about discovery abuse has led to widespread recognition that there is a need for more aggressive judicial control and supervision. ACF Industries, Inc. v. EEOC, 439 U.S. 1081 (1979) (certiorari denied) (Powell, J., dissenting). Sanctions to deter ... slow cooking baby back ribs before grilling