WebCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and ARTURO V. PARCERO, petitioners,vs. PRIMETOWN PROPERTY GROUP INC., respondent. G.R. No. 162155. August 28,2007. Facts: On March 11, 1999, Gilbert Yap, the Vice President of Primetown (respondent), applied for refund of the income tax which they have paid on 1997. According to Yap, the … Mar 6, 1992 ·
Cir v. Primetown (Manner of Computing Time) PDF - Scribd
WebFeb 20, 2024 · Save Save CIR v Primetown (G.R. No. 162155) For Later. 0% 0% found this document useful, Mark this document as useful. ... 4CIR vs. Primetown, G.R. 162155, August 28, 2007. joahnna. Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs Primetown Property Group Inc 531 SCRA 436. Donnell Constantino. ADMIN LAW CASES WEEK 1. Web4. CIR vs. Primetown Property Group, Inc. (GR No. 162155, Aug. 28, 2007) Facts: Respondent Primetown Property Group, Inc., applied for the refund or credit of income tax respondent paid in 1997. In Yap’s letter to … rbft mail
G.R. No. 162155 - Commissioner of Internal Revenue, et al. v.
WebRepublic of the Philippines SUPREME COURT Manila FIRST DIVISION. G. No. 162155 August 28, 2007. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and ARTURO V. PARCERO in his official capacity as Revenue District Officer of Revenue District No. 049 (Makati), Petitioners, vs. PRIMETOWN PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Respondent. D E C I … WebCOMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE vs PRIMETOWN PROPERTY GROUP, INC. case. G.R. No. 162155. August 28, 2007 FACTS. Gilbert Yap, Vice Chair of Primetown applied on March 11, 1999 for a refund or credit of income tax which Primetown paid in 1997. The petitioner suffered losses due to the real estate slowdown therefore was … WebG.R. No. 162155 August 28, 2007 COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and ARTURO V. PARCERO in his official capacity as RevenueDistrict Officer of Revenue District No. 049 (Makati), Petitioners,vs.PRIMETOWN PROPERTY GROUP, INC., Respondent. DECISION CORONA, J.: rbf texting meaning